Online, October 17-18
Online, October 29, 6:30-8:00pm
Online, April 8-11
Online, February 26-27
Louisville, KY, November 18-21
Feature Articles (6500 words) and Perspectives on Practice (1000-1500 words)
100-200 word summaries of education research, history research, teacher resources, teaching strategies, books, and professional development
By May 2021, upload artifacts for your portfolio to Google Drive. Your portfolio should highlight ways in which you engaged in the social practices of an NWP/PhilWP teacher consultant. Because this institute had an emphasis on teaching with primary sources, your portfolio should include components that address your use of sources and strategies from the Library of Congress.
The portfolio, at a minimum, should have 6 artifacts: 2-3 artifacts showcasing your plans you drafted during the summer that address inquiry into practice, professional learning leadership and design, and advocacy; and 3-4 artifacts from the school year that highlight the work you did to carry out these plans. You should also include an annotated table of contents that explains briefly how each artifact connects with the NWP social practices.
Drafts of any of the following:
Inquiry reflection and plans
Professional learning leadership and design
Advocacy issue, plan, and/or design
These are likely in the form of the slides you created on Wednesday (inquiry), Thursday (professional learning), or Friday (advocacy) and/or a TPS Teachers Network post
You may include revised and expanded plans for any of the above
Each examples should reflect the Social Practices of an NWP/PhilWP TC
At least 1 example should involve social practice of collaboration
At least one example should address teaching with primary sources
Examples should (generally) include multiple artifacts:
Professional development design and facilitation example (at school, at a conference, etc.) could include artifacts such as agenda, slides, and a reflection.
Writing + “going public” example could be a written / recorded piece published on a blog, in a journal, as a video, or as a podcast.
Examples might build on one another (but they don’t have to):
I might collaboratively design a curriculum unit with a colleague. We would document our planning and professional learning process together.
The documents that make our professional learning together visible, which may include reflections and journaling, would be Part 2A of the portfolio.
The curriculum unit itself, including teacher and student artifacts and primary sources you incorporated would be Part 2B of the portfolio.
Part 2C of the portfolio could be a podcast episode on NWP radio about the unit with a colleague and/or a student or two.
I might collaboratively design a two-part professional learning workshop on teaching with primary sources at my school.
The documents associated with designing and facilitating the PD would be Part 2A of the portfolio.
I might then (co-)write a reflection of the workshop design and facilitation as well as questions that emerged for the PhilWP blog, which would be Part 2B of the portfolio.
Part 2C of the portfolio could be artifacts and reflections related to facilitating a discussion at the Celebration of Writing and Literacy that may be unrelated to Parts 2A and 2B.
The Teaching with Primary Sources (TPS) program hosts a members-only online forum for educators who have participated in professional development funded by the Library of Congress. This forum is called the TPS Teachers Network.
You will have access to the entire online forum, as well as a private group that is open only to participants and facilitators from this year's Invitational Summer Institute and Advanced Institute. In general, you may choose to post most of your reflections in our private group by replying to existing discussion threads. However, you are encouraged to join and post in other discussion groups as well.
This video explains how to respond to existing threads on the TPS Teachers Network
Our Advanced Institute will focus, in part, on writing about classroom practice as a way to go public, to collaborate, to lead, and to advocate. This spring has been a time of change and challenges. We’re hoping that you might think about a moment of powerful learning for you and/or for your students. This may have also been a moment of dissonance (to borrow from Marsha Pincus) or tension in your work as a teacher. It may have been a puzzling moment (to borrow from Cindy Ballenger). What's one moment that stands out to you as you look back at these past few months?
You might start off with a brief vignette.
You might also introduce what grade / subjects you teach, as well as the neighborhood your school is located in, so that we can get to know you a little more.
You might briefly expand on the vignette by discussing why this moment stands out as well as questions that you have about the moment.
Part of our work during this Advanced Institute will be to reflect on the affordances and tensions around teaching with historical primary sources in our classrooms as we grapple with "hard histories," with resistance, with healing, with justice. Before our meeting in July, we are asking you to reflect:
How and why might we (and/or have you) had students grapple with "hard histories" in your classroom?
What roles might historical primary sources place in these learning experiences? What questions do you have about teaching with historical primary sources?
Use the texts for teachers below (readings, videos, and podcasts) to help you reflect on what some possibilities might be and what questions you have. Add your reflection as a comment in the "Advanced Institute: Post 2" discussion thread on the TPS Teachers Network.
What to focus on:
Try to listen to the podcast first, as it provides important framing for how and why we might teach "hard history" with the help of primary sources. The elementary teacher podcast is approximately 1 hour long; the secondary, 40 minutes.
Bain (2006) encourages teachers to think about how we might "situate textbooks and teachers within the realm of historical inquiry—that is, making them the objects of students’ historical study?" (p. 2080). You might zoom in on the first full paragraph on page 2090 and the section that follows and/or all of page 2098.
Another part of our work during this Advanced Institute will be to reflect on teaching writing and argument as an act of entering an ongoing conversation:
How might seeing (argument) writing as participating in an ongoing, intergenerational conversation influence our teaching of writing?
What is the role of inquiry in writing a researched argument?
How might we view and support students' writing (and arguments as) "on the verge of understanding"?
Use the texts for teachers below (readings, videos, and podcasts) to help you reflect on what some possibilities for teaching argument might be and what questions you have. Add your reflection as a comment in the "Advanced Institute: Post 3" discussion thread on the TPS Teachers Network.
As we discussed in our orientation, this Advanced Institute will provide an opportunity for us to dig deeper into the social practices of an NWP / PhilWP teacher consultant. Based on the social practices, our goals for this institute include supporting each other in:
Engaging in school and classroom inquiries that can be shared with colleagues in and outside of school community and in a range of venues, including through publications and conference presentations
Designing and facilitating professional development with/for other teachers and leading school-wide change
Advocating for our students, schools, communities, and profession
As you look ahead to what may be an uncertain 2020-21 school year, what are some initial ideas you have about writing, going public, engaging with research, collaborating, leading, and advocating? What plans might you make? Add your reflection as a comment in the "Advanced Institute: Post 4" discussion thread in the TPS Teachers Network.
More than 20 teachers are joining PhilWP this summer as participants in the Invitational Summer Institute (ISI) on Writing and Literacy. They have a similar pre-institute prompts about teaching writing, inquiry, and teaching with primary sources. Take a look at some of their posts and provide a thoughtful response to at least one. We see engaging with posts across institutes as an opportunity to welcome teachers into PhilWP and provide support.
Be sure to read posts created by peers in the Advanced Institute. Also, select at least one to respond to.